History
  • No items yet
midpage
Norton v. Abbott
28 How. Pr. 388
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1865
Check Treatment
Judge Sutherland,

who wrote the opinion in the case of Cook agt. Bidwell, held that there was nothing decided in that case dispensing with the necessity of an order for the examination of a party under that section, and that in all cases under section 391, the correct practice is to propose an affidavit setting forth that the cause is at issue, and that the party desires to examine his adversary as to matters material to the issue, and upon such an affidavit procure an order for his examination. That a simple notice to attend, or an ordinary subpoena was not sufficient.

Ingraham, P. J., and Gierke, J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Norton v. Abbott
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 15, 1865
Citation: 28 How. Pr. 388
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.