90 Wis. 415 | Wis. | 1895
By the express terms of the bond, Thomas, as principal, and HoteKkiss and Ellis, as sureties, “ are held and firmly bound unto” the plaintiff in the sum named, and “for which payment well and truly to be made” they thereby bound themselves, their “heirs, executors, and administrators, jointly and severally.” The obligation is not to guaranty collection, but for each and all together to pay in case of breach. This being so, and the breach of the bond by Thomas receiving the $321.13 as such agent, and then refus
The motion to strike out the respondent’s brief, on the ground that it contains language disrespectful to counsel, is denied. The language complained of is too inconsequential to call for comment.
By the Gourt.— The two orders of the circuit court are both affirmed.