North Carolina v. TempleNorth Carolina v. Temple
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting:
'■ I dissent from so much of the judgment in this case as holds that this suit cannot be ■ maintained against the. auditor of
Lead Opinion
after stating the case as above, delivered the opinion of the court.
We think it perfectly clear that the suit against the auditor in this case was virtually a suit against the State of North Carolina. In this regard it comes within the principle of the cases of Louisiana v. Jumel,
The other point, the suability of the State, is settled by the decision just rendered in Hans v. The State of Louisiana, ante, 1.
To the question on which the judges of the Circuit Court were opposed in opinion, our answer is in the negative, namely, that the suit could not be maintained' in the Circuit Court against the State of North Carolina by the plaintiff, a citizen thereof.
The decree of the Circuit Court is
Reversed and the cause rema/nded with instructions to dis- " miss 'the Mil of corrvplaAnt.