Case Information
*1 Case 2:20-cv-10539-AJT-DRG ECF No. 96, PageID.1453 Filed 01/05/22 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION N ORTH A MERICAN S PECIALTY
I NSURANCE C OMPANY , Case No. 20-10539
Plaintiff, S ENIOR U.S. D ISTRICT J UDGE A RTHUR J. T ARNOW v.
M AGISTRATE J UDGE T ITAN R ETAIL D EVELOPMENT D AVID R. G RAND I NDUSTRIES , LLC, ET AL ,
Defendants.
/
*2 Case 2:20-cv-10539-AJT-DRG ECF No. 96, PageID.1454 Filed 01/05/22 Page 2 of 2
On August 4, 2021, the Court referred Plainitff’s Motion [78] to the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 84). The Magistrate Judge held a hearing on September 21, 2021, and issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on November 22, 2021, recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion [78] be granted. (ECF No. 94). No objections were filed within the fourteen-day period for filing objections.
The Court having reviewed the record, the R&R [94] is hereby ADOPTED and entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Claims Against Nadia and Stamatios Vlahos without Prejudice [78] is GRANTED .
SO ORDERED .
s/Arthur J. Tarnow Arthur J. Tarnow Dated: January 5, 2022 Senior United States District Judge
Page 2 of 2 O RDER A DOPTING R EPORT AND R ECOMMENDATION
[94] AND G RANTING P LAINTIFF ’ S M OTION TO V OLUNTARILY D ISMISS C LAIMS A GAINST N ADIA AND S TAMATIOS V LAHOS WITHOUT P REJUDICE On July 16, 2021, Plaintiff moved to voluntarily dismiss its claims against Defendants Nadia and Stamatios Vlahos (“the Vlahoses”) without prejudice. (ECF No. 78). The Vlahoses responded in opposition on July 27, 2021, arguing the Court should either condition voluntary dismissal without prejudice on Plaintiff’s payment of their defense costs, or dismiss Plaintiff’s claims with prejudice. (ECF No. 80, PageID.1231). Plaintiff replied on August 3, 2021. (ECF No. 83). Page 1 of 2