121 N.Y.S. 512 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1910
The defendant, Joseph M. Lee, appeals from a judgment entered upon the verdict at Trial Term in the payee’s action upon a promissory note dated June 1, 1900. The defendants are husband and wife, and the said payee is the mothér-in-law of the said defendant — appellant. The answer pleads the Statute of Limitations, and that, the note was for the accommodation of the plaintiff I -think that the evidence was sufficient to justify the verdict. The appellant
Upon the re-direct examination of the defendant he was asked a series of questions, whether he could remember what he meant-by this statement, whether he remembered. that there was any matter to be settled between the plaintiff and himself at -that time, and whether he had ány transaction by which money might be payable by or to him between himself and the plaintiff in or about the
The judgment- should be reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event.
Hibschbeeg, P. J., Bubb, Thomas and Cabb, JJ., concurred.
Judgment reversed and new trial granted,’costs to abide the event.