History
  • No items yet
midpage
Norris v. Brown
143 S.E. 878
S.C.
1928
Check Treatment

June 28, 1928. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This is an appeal from an order of his Honor. Judge Sease, dissolving a temporary restraining order or injunction issued by him September 9, 1927. Let the order of Judge Sease be reported.

Under the view which we take of the case, it is unnecessary to recite at length the facts. The granting or refusing an injunction rests within the sound discretion of the Circuit Judge. Frederick v. Brown, 115 S.C. 415;106 S.E., 31. Pelzer v. Hughes, 27 S.C. 408; 3 S.E., 781.Cooper v. Boylston, 120 S.C. 381; 113 S.E., 347; 32 C. J., p. 29, et seq. Appellants have failed to satisfy this *Page 281 Court that his Honor, the Circuit Judge, erroneously exercised his discretion in dissolving the temporary injunction.

The judgment of this Court is that the order appealed from be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WATTS and MESSRS. JUSTICES COTHRAN and CARTER concur.

MR. JUSTICE STABLER did not participate.

Case Details

Case Name: Norris v. Brown
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Jun 28, 1928
Citation: 143 S.E. 878
Docket Number: 12475
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.