History
  • No items yet
midpage
Norman v. Hope
2 Miles 142
Pennsylvania Court of Common P...
1837
Check Treatment
Pettit, President.—

Though the cases do not entirely agree, yet the true principle to be extracted from them, is that where more persons are named as defendants than the proper number, a nolle prosequi may be entered as to some, where no possible injury can be done to any of the defendants by it—as where no question of contribution is involved. But where such a question is involved, the plaintiff will be nonsuited on the trial. A nolle prosequi may be entered as to married women, or bankrupts, there being a personal incapacity, and no ground for a question of contribution. See Moss v. Ingham, 1 Wilson 89. The principle applies in this case.

Leave given.

Case Details

Case Name: Norman v. Hope
Court Name: Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Date Published: Sep 23, 1837
Citation: 2 Miles 142
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.