Norkin v. Milman
15-1931
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Aug 17, 2016

*1 Before WELLS, LAGOA and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm for the reasons articulated in the trial court’s detailed, well- reasoned order titled, “Order Granting Defendants’ Verified Motion to Strike Intervenors’ ‘Supplemental and Intervening Complaint as Sham’ (as Supplemented).”

Affirmed.

2