midpage

Noriega v. KingNoriega v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 15, 2005
Versions:15 A.D.3d 267
789 N.Y.S.2d 491
2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1530

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Faviola A. Soto, J.), entered on or about June 14, 2004, which denied defendant King‘s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

King‘s reliance on the emergency doctrine is improperly raised for the first time on appeal (see Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 292 AD2d 159 [2002]). In any event, evidence that King was approximately three car-lengths behind plaintiff‘s vehicle, which was being driven erratically, when he observed that vehicle‘s brake lights, and that King may have been exceeding the posted speed limit when he struck plaintiff‘s vehicle, raise issues of fact precluding summary judgment in his favor (see Herbert v Morgan Drive-A-Way, 84 NY2d 835 [1994]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Marlow, Nardelli and Catterson, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Noriega v. King
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 15, 2005
Citations: 15 A.D.3d 267; 789 N.Y.S.2d 491; 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1530
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In