History
  • No items yet
midpage
Norem v. Lincoln Benefit Life Company
1:10-cv-02233
N.D. Ill.
Mar 20, 2012
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Order Form (01/2005)

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Name of Assigned Judge Philip G. Reinhard Sitting Judge if Other or Magistrate Judge than Assigned Judge

CASE NUMBER 10 C 2233 DATE 3/20/2012 CASE Norem vs. Lincoln Benefit Life Co.

TITLE DOCKET ENTRY TEXT:

For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s motion to certify a class is denied without prejudice.

Notices mailed by Judicial staff. ■ [ For further details see text below.] STATEMENT - OPINION

Plaintiff, Dennis G. Norem, M.D. brings this putative class action on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated against defendant Lincoln Benefit Life Co. Plaintiff alleges defendant breached the terms of an insurance policy it sold him by including costs in calculating the cost of insurance rates (“COI”) for the policy beyond the costs allowed to be included in the COI rates by the policy language. Jurisdiction is premised on 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (d)(2). Plaintiff moves to certify a class.

By separate order, the court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment against the named plaintiff. “A decision that the claim of the named plaintiffs lacks merit ordinarily, though not invariably, disqualifies the named plaintiffs as proper class representatives. The effect is to moot the question whether to certify the suit as a class action unless the lawyers for the class manage to find another representative.” Wiesmueller v. Kosobucki, 513 F.3d 784, 786 (7 th Cir. 2008), citing, Cowen v. Bank United of Texas, FSB, 70 F.3d 937 (7 th Cir. 1995). Since the grounds on which the court granted defendant summary judgment would appear to apply equally to any other member of the class, it appears unlikely a proper representative can be found. See Cowen, 70 F.3d at 941. Proceeding on the question of certifying a class after a decision on the merits adverse to the named plaintiff, creates claim preclusion hazards for class members. See Randall v. Rolls-Royce Corp., 637 F.3d 818, 820-21 (7 th Cir. 2011).

For the foregoing reasons, plaintiff’s motion to certify a class is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff’s counsel may move, within 28 days of the entry of this order, to renew the motion for class certification either with a new class representative or by presenting an argument as to why Dr. Norem remains a proper class representative despite the grant of summary judgment against him. Plaintiff’s counsel may also notify the court within that time frame that they wish to withdraw the motion for class certification and the court will grant the withdrawal and vacate this order denying the motion.

10C2233 Norem vs. Lincoln Benefit Life Co. Page 1 of 1

Case Details

Case Name: Norem v. Lincoln Benefit Life Company
Court Name: District Court, N.D. Illinois
Date Published: Mar 20, 2012
Docket Number: 1:10-cv-02233
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Ill.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.