History
  • No items yet
midpage
Noia v. De Rosa
54 N.Y.2d 631
NY
1981
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We find no error of law in the charge to the jury given by the trial court, and the order of the Appellate Division should not be reversed on that ground.

Insofar as the determination of the Appellate Division to reverse the Trial Term’s order for a new trial and to *633reinstate the jury verdict was based on that court’s evaluation of the weight of the evidence it is not subject to our review (Donigi v American Cyanamid Co., 43 NY2d 935; Pfohl v Wipperman, 34 NY2d 597).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: Noia v. De Rosa
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 18, 1981
Citation: 54 N.Y.2d 631
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.