History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nixon v. State
691 So. 2d 45
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1997
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. However, we do so because habeas corpus is not a substitute for obtaining relief as to issues which could have or should have been raised in Rule 3.850 proceedings. See White v. Dugger, 511 So.2d 554 (Fla.1987). The two year “window” period for instituting such proceedings in the Circuit Court for the Sixth Judicial Circuit in Pinellas County, Florida, "will expire in September of 1997.'

MINER, ALLEN and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Nixon v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Apr 9, 1997
Citation: 691 So. 2d 45
Docket Number: No. 96-2145
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
    Nixon v. State, 691 So. 2d 45