History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nixon v. Hyserott
5 Johns. 58
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1809
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The attorney was authorised to sell and to execute conveyances, and assurances in the law, of the lands sold ; but no authority was given to bind his principal, by covenants. A conveyance or assurance is good and perfect without either warranty or personal covenants ; and therefore they are not necessarily implied in an authority to convey ; an authority is to be strictly pursued, and an act varying in substance from it is void. There must be a judgment of nonsuit, according to the ’ direction in the case.

Van Ness, J.

having formerly been concerned as counsel in the cause, gave no opinion.

Judgment of nonsuit.

Case Details

Case Name: Nixon v. Hyserott
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 15, 1809
Citation: 5 Johns. 58
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.