History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nix v. Earley
263 N.C. 795
N.C.
1965
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

After careful and full consideration of the evidence, we are of opinion, and so decide, that there is no evidence sufficient to support plaintiff’s allegation that Lonnie Nix was crossing Highway #70 within an unmarked crosswalk at an intersection. G.S. 20-173; G.S. 20-174; G.S. 20-38(1).

If it be conceded that the evidence was sufficient to require submission of an issue as to defendant’s actionable negligence, it is manifest, that the negligence of Lonnie Nix was at least one of the proximate causes of his fatal injuries. The only reasonable conclusion to be drawn from the evidence is that Lonnie Nix, notwithstanding he could and should have observed the approach of defendant’s car, walked or ran directly into the path thereof. The applicable legal principles are stated in Blake v. Mallard, 262 N.C. 62, 136 S.E. 2d 214, and cases cited.

On the grounds stated, the judgment of involuntary nonsuit is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Nix v. Earley
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Feb 24, 1965
Citation: 263 N.C. 795
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.