History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nieto v. Wells
576 So. 2d 767
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1991
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the trial court’s denial of a petition for administration of a will. We affirm.

We have carefully considered each of appellants’ points on appeal. Construing the record as a whole, we conclude there was competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding that the will was procured by undue influence and that the testator, Elsie Elliott Ryan, lacked testamentary capacity when the will was executed. It is not this court’s function to reweigh the evidence and we must give all deference to the trial court’s decision. See Sun Bank/Miami, N.A. v. Hogarth, 536 So.2d 263, 267 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), review denied 545 So.2d 1369 (Fla.1989); Elson v. Vargas, 520 So.2d 76, 78 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied 528 So.2d 1181 (Fla.1988); Sacchetti v. McDermott, 538 So.2d 127 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

Case Details

Case Name: Nieto v. Wells
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 26, 1991
Citation: 576 So. 2d 767
Docket Number: No. 90-1473
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.