History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nidiffer v. Nidiffer
44 Okla. 218
Okla.
1914
Check Treatment

This action was instituted in the district court of Ottawa county by Lucy Nidiffer against Robert Nidiffer for a divorce on the grounds of adultery and for alimony. Judgment was rendered in favor of Lucy Nidiffer for a divorce and $1,600 alimony, which sum was made a lien on the W. 1/2 of the S.W. 1/4 of section 5, township 26 N., range 23 E., I. M. Motion for a new trial was filed and overruled, and exceptions allowed.

The action of the trial court in overruling the motion for a new trial is not assigned as error, and, as all the questions raised by the petition in error occurred during the progress of the trial, we cannot consider them, in the absence of an assignment of error based on the overruling of the motion for a new trial. Avery et al. v. Hays et al., ante, 144 P. 624.

The cause should, therefore, be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered. *Page 219

Case Details

Case Name: Nidiffer v. Nidiffer
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Nov 10, 1914
Citation: 44 Okla. 218
Docket Number: 3868
Court Abbreviation: Okla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.