History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nickerson v. California Raisin Co.
61 Cal. 268
Cal.
1882
Check Treatment
Ross, J.:

To have justified the Court below in setting aside the default, an affidavit of merits on the part of the defendant was essential. Such affidavit must show that the defendant has fully and fairly stated the facts of the case to his counsel, before the advice of the latter could amount to a prima facie showing of merits on defendant’s behalf. It is obvious that a statement, such as is found in the affidavit in the present case, that, defendant has fully and fairly stated the said defendant’s defense in this action” to his counsel, does not answer *269the requirement. It might be that the defense relied on was a purely technical one, that did not touch the merits of the controversy. The expression used in the affidavit is not the equivalent of a statement that the defendant had fully and fairly stated to his counsel all the facts in the case.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Thoenton, Shabpstein, and McKinstry, JJ., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Nickerson v. California Raisin Co.
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 22, 1882
Citation: 61 Cal. 268
Docket Number: No. 7,910
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.