History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nicholson v. Salem Area Transit
126 Or. App. 172
Or. Ct. App.
1994
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that it does not have jurisdiction to review an order of the Director under ORS 656.245(1)(b) concerning the appropriateness of palliative care. We have disposed of most of the issues that claimant raises in Hathaway v. Health Future Enterprises, 125 Or App 549, 865 P2d 503 (1993). Claimant contends that the Board’s ruling that claimant has no right to a hearing on palliative care disputes violates the United States and Oregon constitutions. The issue is raised for the first time on review, and we will not address it.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Nicholson v. Salem Area Transit
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Jan 26, 1994
Citation: 126 Or. App. 172
Docket Number: 91-03460; CA A76237
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.