History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nichols v. Whiting
1 Root 443
Conn.
1792
Check Treatment
By the Court.

There is nothing! erroneous in the judgment complained of; the plea in bar is insufficient, in that it doth not particularize the articles of shopwork tendered', whereby they could be distinguished and known. Otherwise the plaintiff would be barred of his action, by the tender, without being able ever to recover the articles tendered, for want of being particularly distinguished and described.

Case Details

Case Name: Nichols v. Whiting
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Aug 15, 1792
Citation: 1 Root 443
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.