1 Chand. 203 | Wis. | 1849
The question in this case arises upon my decision in ruling out the chattel mortgage of the goods alleged to have been taken by the plaintiffs in error, and for the taking of which the suit is brought. The plea- was the general issue, and when the mortgage was offered in evidence by the plaintiffs in error, the defendants below, I was of opinion that the plaintiff below, the mortgagor, had a legal interest remaining in the goods mortgaged, after a breach of the condition, ac
It was rejected, and for that reason the judgment which was rendered against the defendants must be reversed.
Judgment of the circuit court reversed, with costs.