History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nichols v. Sonia
114 Me. 545
Me.
1915
Check Treatment

Action of slander in which the principal averment of the declaration is: “You (meaning the plaintiff) are certainly a damned fool. You (meaning the plaintiff) lied under oath in your case against me (meaning the defendant) in the lower court.” A general demurrer to the declaration was sustained and the case comes up on exceptions to that ruling.

The exceptions must be overruled. The declaration is clearly defective for want of a sufficient averment of the particular court wherein, and of the specific proceeding in relation to which, the alleged false swearing occurred.

In Small v. Clewley, 60 Maine, 262, which was' an action for slander based on an alleged accusation of false swearing, Walton, J., speaking for the court, said: “The averment must be specific, naming the particular court, or tribunal, or officer, or matter or thing in relation to which the alleged false swearing is said to have taken place, or it will not be sufficient.”

Case Details

Case Name: Nichols v. Sonia
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Oct 9, 1915
Citation: 114 Me. 545
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.