History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nichols v. Hardegree
1918 Ala. LEXIS 323
Ala.
1918
Check Treatment

The failure of the appellant to assign any errors requires the affirmance of the judgment below. Rule 1, Supreme Court Prac. (20 South. iv); Civil Code, p. 1506; Pettibone v. Bank,156 Ala. 666, 46 So. 751; Amerson v. Corona Coal Co.,194 Ala. 175, 69 So. 601; Kinnon v. L. N. R. R. Co., 187 Ala. 480,65 So. 397; Dickens v. Dickens, 174 Ala. 345, 56 So. 809; Brahan v. Collins, Minor, 169; Chavers v. Mayo, ante, p. 128, 79 So. 594.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Nichols v. Hardegree
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jun 27, 1918
Citation: 1918 Ala. LEXIS 323
Docket Number: 7 Div. 845.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.