Nicholas v. StateNicholas v. State
Francis Michael Nicholas appeals the written order of the trial court finding that he is a sexual predator. As he was denied a hearing on this issue, we reverse.
Nicholas pled no contest to a single count of lewd and lascivious assault on a child under 16 in violation of
Nicholas asserts in this appeal, and his sentencing scoresheet apрears to support him, that he has no qualifying prior convictions. He has not had the opportunity to assert this position in the trial court because he had no notice of thе motion seeking sexual predator designаtion, and the designation was made without a hearing. In addition, nothing in the record reflects thаt the trial court made a determination regarding whether Nicholas had any qualifying previous convictions. If, indeed, he has no such qualifying offenses in his history, then Nicholas is not eligible for thе designation, and it should be removed. See Johnson v. State, 716 So.2d 332 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
We conclude that the designation of Nicholas аs a sexual predator must be reversed and remanded for a hearing, upon proрer notice, to allow the State to demonstrate by competent evidence that Nicholas is qualified for the designation, and to allow Nicholas to contest that designation.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
PETERSON and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.