History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nicastro v. State
624 So. 2d 667
Ala. Crim. App.
1993
Check Treatment

ON RETURN TO REMAND

The appellant, Michael Angelo Nicastro, appealed from the denial of three petitions for post-conviction relief filed under Rule 32, A.R.Crim.P. We remanded this cause so that the circuit court could conduct an evidentiary hearing on the appellant's allegations. The trial court has complied with our directions and has held a hearing. However, the court failed to make "specific findings of fact relating to each material issue of fact presented" as required by Rule 32.9(d), A.R.Crim.P. Thus, this cause is again remanded to the Circuit Court for Jefferson County so that that court may comply with Rule 32.9(d), A.R.Crim.P. Due return *Page 668 should be filed with this court no later than 28 days from the date of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Nicastro v. State
Court Name: Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Date Published: Feb 12, 1993
Citation: 624 So. 2d 667
Docket Number: CR-91-861
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Crim. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.