Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied. Order of affirmance entered November 29, 1922 [See 203 App. Div. 497], amended so as to strike out findings of fact Nos. V, XII, XIII and XV, also the following words in finding No. X: “ to be crossed by defendant’s livestock as if it were a farm crossing,” upon the ground that tb»y are not supported by evidence. The words “ which deed purported to convey ” in finding No. II are modified so as to read, “ which deed conveyed.” The words “so purporting to convey” in finding No. Ill are modified so as to read, “ so convoying.” The following additional finding is made by this court: That stock of the defendant from time to time entered upon the plaintiff’s said property from defendant’s adjoining property and grazed at will thereon.
Niagara v. Mitchell
205 A.D. 865
N.Y. App. Div.1923Check TreatmentAI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.