History
  • No items yet
midpage
Newsome v. State
1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 55
| Ga. Ct. App. | 1929
|
Check Treatment
Broyles, C. J.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence is cumulative and is not of such a character as would probably produce a diSerent result upon another trial of the case. Furthermore, the ground of the motion for a new trial based upon the alleged newly discovered evidence is fatally defective, since the supporting affidavits as to the residence, character, etc., of the “newly discovered” witness fail to give the names of his associates. Ivey v. State, 154 Ga. 63 (6) (113 S. E. 175).

2. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error for any reason assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Newsome v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 9, 1929
Citation: 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 55
Docket Number: 19762
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.