History
  • No items yet
midpage
211 S.W.3d 157
Mo. Ct. App.
2007

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tom Newsham (“Newsham”) appeals from a dismissal of his petition for a claim of premises liability against St. Louis Christian Center Church (“the Church”). Newsham claims three points on appeal. First, Newsham claims that the trial court erred in granting the Church’s Motion to Dismiss on his claim of premises liability because he produced evidence that he had a claim as an invitee. Second, Newsham alleges that the trial court erred in granting the Church’s Motion to Dismiss because he produced evidence that he had a claim as a licensee. Third, Newsham claims that the trial court erred in granting the Church’s Motion to Dismiss because the “Firefighter’s Rule” is inapplicable in his case.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Newsham v. ST. LOUIS CHRISTIAN CENTER CHURCH
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 9, 2007
Citations: 211 S.W.3d 157; 2007 WL 46032; 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 35; ED 87972
Docket Number: ED 87972
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    Newsham v. ST. LOUIS CHRISTIAN CENTER CHURCH, 211 S.W.3d 157