Newman v. State, 476 So. 2d 775

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the transcripts of the deposition and motion to suppress in this case, and it is clear to us that the investigating trooper first smelled marijuana in the subject vehicle while standing outside the vehicle — without any intrusion — and also smelled it subsequently when his head intruded into the vehicle. Accordingly, we conclude that the motion to suppress was properly denied; and we affirm.

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Newman v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Oct 16, 1985

Citations: 476 So. 2d 775; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2359; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16275; No. 85-671

Docket Number: No. 85-671

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.