Newman v. BerkowitzNewman v. Berkowitz
This breach of contract action should have been dismissed because defendant, as an individual, was not a party to the contract. Read as a whole, the letter agreement, which was drafted on the letterhead of defendant‘s professional corporation and included a schedule indicating that legal fees were to be shared between plaintiff and defendant‘s professional corporation, shows that the intended party was the corporation. The absence of a reference to a corporate office above or below defendant‘s personal signature does not prove otherwise (see 150 Broadway N.Y. Assoc., L.P. v Bodner, 14 AD3d 1, 7 [2004]; PNC Capital Recovery v Mechanical Parking Sys., 283 AD2d 268, 270-271 [2001], lv dismissed 96 NY2d 937 [2001], appeal dismissed 98 NY2d 763 [2002]).
Conduct is frivolous if “it is completely without merit in law and cannot be supported by a reasonable argument for an extension, modification or reversal of existing law” (