History
  • No items yet
midpage
Newman v. Aramoonie
280 A.D. 899
N.Y. App. Div.
1952
Check Treatment

In an action to recover damages for conversion, defendant appeals from an order, made on reargument, insofar as said order denies defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and grants plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment on the first counterclaim alleged in the answer. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The defendant made no claim for storage charges at the time that demand was made for the return of the machine after the purchase price had been repaid and, in any event, defendant was then unable to return the machine because of an existent chattel mortgage with which he had encumbered it. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, MaeCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Newman v. Aramoonie
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Sep 29, 1952
Citation: 280 A.D. 899
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.