History
  • No items yet
midpage
Newhoff v. Rochester
66 Pa. Super. 297
Pa. Super. Ct.
1917
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

The only assignment presented is that the court erred in discharging the appellant’s rule for judgment on the appellee’s answer to interrogatories.

The opinion filed by Audeneied, J., is a convincing answer to the appellant’s argument, and for the reasons given in discharging the rule, the judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Newhoff v. Rochester
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Mar 16, 1917
Citation: 66 Pa. Super. 297
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 194
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.