Newhoff v. Rochester
66 Pa. Super. 297 | Pa. Super. Ct. | 1917
The only assignment presented is that the court erred in discharging the appellant’s rule for judgment on the appellee’s answer to interrogatories.
The opinion filed by Audeneied, J., is a convincing answer to the appellant’s argument, and for the reasons given in discharging the rule, the judgment is affirmed.
