Newhoff v. Rochester
66 Pa. Super. 297
Pa. Super. Ct.1917Check TreatmentThe only assignment presented is that the court erred in discharging the appellant’s rule for judgment on the appellee’s answer to interrogatories.
The opinion filed by Audeneied, J., is a convincing answer to the appellant’s argument, and for the reasons given in discharging the rule, the judgment is affirmed.