History
  • No items yet
midpage
Newell v. Woodward
241 A.D. 786
N.Y. App. Div.
1934
Check Treatment

Order reversed, on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Motion to dismiss complaint granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the plaintiff to plead anew within twenty days after entry and service of copy of the order to be entered hereon, on the ground that the allegation in the complaint that the “ defendants so negligently, recklessly and carelessly managed, maintained and operated said premises, dance hall, amusement park and parking space, that the plaintiff was caused to fall into a ravine and as a result thereof the plaintiff sustained serious and permanent injuries as hereinafter set forth ” does not plead -facts. The negligence under such an allegation might consist of any one of a wide variety of acts. (Pagnillo v. Mack Paving & Construction Co., 142 App. Div. 491.) Hill, P. J., Rhodes, MeNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Newell v. Woodward
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 15, 1934
Citation: 241 A.D. 786
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.