Newark Insurance v. CarusoNewark Insurance v. Caruso
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.
Physical contact is a condition precedent to recovery on an uninsured motorist claim (see
Contrary to the Supreme Court‘s conclusion, the uncontroverted evidence adduced at the hearing established that the appellant‘s accident was caused by physical contact with a hit-and-run automobile. As the court‘s determination to the contrary was not supported by a fair interpretation of the credible evidence, its order granting the insurer‘s petition for a stay of arbitration must be reversed (see Matter of Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp. [Landau], 20 AD2d 699 [1964]; see also Greenhill v Stillwell, 306 AD2d 434 [2003]; Coverdale v Zucker, 261 AD2d 429 [1999]; cf. Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v McMahon, 251 AD2d 571 [1998]; Matter of Aetna Life & Cas. v Gramazio, 242 AD2d 530 [1997]). S. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.