New York v. Sutton
94 S. Ct. 1576
SCOTUS1974Check TreatmentLead Opinion
Ct. App. N. Y. Motion of respondent Peltzman for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
I dissent because I cannot agree that this case does not merit oral argument. Nor do I agree that if this is the kind of narcotics law enforcement New York wants, that is up to New York. Here the New York Court of Appeals has rested its decision on federal constitutional grounds. Absent full oral argument, I would grant the writ and reverse the judgment of that court essentially for the reasons stated by the three dissenting judges of that court.
