History
  • No items yet
midpage
New York v. Sutton
94 S. Ct. 1576
SCOTUS
1974
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Ct. App. N. Y. Motion of respondent Peltzman for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.






Dissenting Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Burger, with whom Mr. Justice Blackmun joins,

dissenting.

I dissent because I cannot agree that this case does not merit oral argument. Nor do I agree that if this is the kind of narcotics law enforcement New York wants, that is up to New York. Here the New York Court of Appeals has rested its decision on federal constitutional grounds. Absent full oral argument, I would grant the writ and reverse the judgment of that court essentially for the reasons stated by the three dissenting judges of that court.

Case Details

Case Name: New York v. Sutton
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Mar 18, 1974
Citation: 94 S. Ct. 1576
Docket Number: No. 73-425
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.