midpage

New York Telephone Co. v. SpecinerNew York Telephone Co. v. Speciner

New York Court of Appeals
Feb 23, 1982
Versions:55 N.Y.2d 1002
434 N.E.2d 708
449 N.Y.S.2d 472
1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3174

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order insofar as appealed from reversed, with costs, cross motion for a permanent stay denied, and motion to compel arbitration granted. A timely demand for arbitration was made by Marshall in February, 1972 well within the six-year Statute of Limitations and was judicially stayed until the condition precedent to arbitration was satisfied. The condition was met in November, 1973 after Marshall submitted its claim to the architect who failed to render a decision within 10 days. Any further questions as to undue delay or abandonment of the proceeding are for the arbitrator (see Matter of County of Rockland [Primiano Constr. Co.], 51 NY2d 1).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, and Meyer. Taking no part: Judges Gabrielli and Fuchsberg.

Case Details

Case Name: New York Telephone Co. v. Speciner
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 23, 1982
Citations: 55 N.Y.2d 1002; 434 N.E.2d 708; 449 N.Y.S.2d 472; 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3174
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In