History
  • No items yet
midpage
New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. McKeon
189 U.S. 508
SCOTUS
1903
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with *509costs and interest, on the authority of Wheeler v. New York etc. Railroad Company, 178 U. S. 321; New York and, New England Railroad Company v. Bristol, 151 U. S. 556; Arrowsmith v. Harmoning, 118 U. S. 194; Little Rock etc. Railway Company v. Worthen, 120 U. S. 97-102; Davidson v. New Orleans, 96 U. S. 97, 105. See 53 Atl. Rep. 656.

Mr. Arthur M. Marsh for plaintiff in error. Mr. Stiles Judson, Jr., for defendant in error.

Case Details

Case Name: New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. McKeon
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Apr 27, 1903
Citation: 189 U.S. 508
Docket Number: No. 611
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.