History
  • No items yet
midpage
New York ex rel. Retsof Mining Co. v. Graves
308 U.S. 503
SCOTUS
1939
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

Without passing on the question whether the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals was properly invoked by application for leave to appeal to that court, the motion to dismiss the appeal to this Court is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. And*504erson v. Forty-Two Broadway Co., 239 U. S. 69, 72-73; Denman v. Slayton, 282 U. S. 514, 519-520.

Mr. Henry B. Twombly for. appellant. Messrs. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney General of New York, and Wendell P. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Case Details

Case Name: New York ex rel. Retsof Mining Co. v. Graves
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 9, 1939
Citation: 308 U.S. 503
Docket Number: No. 143
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.