New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. GonzalezNew York Central Mutual Fire Insurance v. Gonzalez
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The appellants’ failure to complete and return a sworn “Notice of Intention to Make Claim” form, which their insurer promptly provided to the appellants’ attorney on September 9, 2004, after receiving the attorney‘s letter dated September 2, 2004, constituted a breach of a condition of coverage under the policy‘s supplementary uninsured/underinsured motorists endorsement, providing a basis for disclaimer or denial of coverage (see Matter of New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v Aguirre, 7 NY3d 772 [2006]). The insurer‘s commencement of the instant proceeding on October 5, 2004, following receipt of the appellants’ notice of intention to arbitrate on September 16, 2004, constituted timely, sufficient denial of coverage and disclaimer “as soon as reasonably possible” (
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch
The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Adams, J.P., Ritter, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.