23 F. 596 | U.S. Cir. Ct. | 1884
This is an application for a preliminary injunction. I have no difficulty on the question of infringement. The exhibits of the defendants’ manufacture, both in 1882 and 1884, show quite clearly, to my mind, that they are infringements of .the complainant’s patent. But the evidence of the defendants, and especially the affidavits of the expert, Weigand, throw'some doubt on its novelty. Under the circumstances, I regard it as a proper case in which to refuse an injunction, if the defendants will execute a bond to secure the complainant on the accounting, if, upon final hearing, there shall be a decree sustaining the validity of the patent. The injunction is therefore withheld, provided that the defendants, within 10 days,