New Jersey Brick Co. v. A. M. Krantz Co.

94 N.J.L. 255 | N.J. | 1920

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will he affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams,.Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson,-Jj... 13.

For reversal—None.

midpage