68 F. 224 | U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York | 1895
It is not pretended that the invention is a broad one. It relates only to a minor impiwement in an over crowded art. The claim is clear and explicit. There is no room for mistake; a tyro in mechanics can understand its
For the reason, then, that the defendant’s machine omits two elements of the combination of the claim it must be held that it does not infringe. The bill is dismissed.