Nevin v. Spieckermann
1 Sadler 400 | Pa. | 1886
The contention here is a very narrow one. The plaintiff in error submitted one point only to the court. It consists, however, of two parts. The court substantially affirmed the point, but added a qualification to which no just exception can be tahen. The case was one for the jury, and was submitted to it in a correct charge.
Judgment affirmed.
