History
  • No items yet
midpage
Neudecker v. Philpot
174 F.2d 668
D.C. Cir.
1949
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

In dismissing on her own motion a wife’s complaint for divorce, the District Court denied counsel fees to her attorneys. They appeal from this denial.

In view of a later colloquy between court and counsel, it is not clear to us from the court’s memorandum and order whether (1) fees were denied on the theory that the court had no authority to award them in the circumstances of the particular case, or (2) the court decided, in the exercise of the discretion granted by the statute, D.C. Code 1940, § 16 — 410, that no fees should be awarded. We think the court had authority to award or deny fees and the exercise of its discretion was required. The case must therefore be remanded for a further order. If discretion was exercised by the appealed order, a new order denying fees or confirming the appealed order will be sufficient.

Case Details

Case Name: Neudecker v. Philpot
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: May 2, 1949
Citation: 174 F.2d 668
Docket Number: No. 9910
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.