History
  • No items yet
midpage
Neu v. Teen Time, Inc.
195 N.Y.S.2d 670
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1959
|
Check Treatment

Appeal from so much of a resettled order as denied a motion to vacate the service of the summons and complaint on appellant, a foreign corporation, on the ground that it was not “ doing business ” here. Resettled order modified by striking therefrom everything beginning with the word “ denied ” in the second ordering paragraph and ending with the words “ the Official Referee ” and by substituting therefor the word “ granted ”. As so modified, resettled order insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, appellant was not “ doing business ” in this State (Miller v. Surf Props., 4 N Y 2d 475; Pennrich & Go. v. Juniata Hosiery Mills, 247 N. Y. 592; Hamlin v. Barrett & Go., 246 N. Y. 554). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [18 Misc 2d 234.]

Case Details

Case Name: Neu v. Teen Time, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 31, 1959
Citation: 195 N.Y.S.2d 670
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.