History
  • No items yet
midpage
Network Signatures Inc v. Aetna Inc
8:11-cv-01674
C.D. Cal.
Jun 14, 2012
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 8:11-cv-01674-JVS-RNB Document 29 Filed 06/14/12 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:199

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. 8:11-cv-00920-JVS (RNBx) Date June 14, 2012

8:11-cv-01481-JVS (RNBx)

8:11-cv-01614-JVS (RNBx)

* 8:11-cv-01674-JVS (RNBx)* 8:11-cv-01729-JVS (RNBx)

8:12-cv-00074-JVS (RNBx)

8:12-cv-00507-JVS (RNBx)

8:12-cv-00529-JVS (RNBx)

8:12-cv-00598-JVS (RNBx) _______________________________________________________________ Title Network Signatures Inc v. Anheuser-Busch Companies Inc

Network Signatures Inc v. The Coca-Cola Company Network Signatures Inc v. Nestle USA Inc * Network Signatures Inc v. Aetna Inc * Network Signatures Inc v. General Mills Inc Network Signatures Inc v. The Gap Inc Network Signatures, Inc v. Purdue Pharma L.P.

Network Signatures Inc v. ConocoPhillips Company Network Signatures Inc v. Humana Inc ________________________________________________________________ Present: The Honorable James V. Selna

Adrianna Gonzalez Not Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present Proceedings (IN CHAMBER) Order to Show Cause re Stay of Proceedings :

On June 14, 21012, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant in Network Signatures, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, SACV 11-0982 JVS (RNBx) (Docket No. 51). In part, the Court held that U.S. Patent No 5,511,122 (“’122 Patent”) was invalid based on the inequitable conduct of Network Signature Inc.’s (“Network Signatures”) licensor. (Docket No. 51, p. 19.)

The ’122 Patent is asserted in each of the above listed cases. The *2 Case 8:11-cv-01674-JVS-RNB Document 29 Filed 06/14/12 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:200

Court’s ruling in State Farm would appear to be equally dispositive of the claims in these cases.

The Court orders the parties to show cause in writing within ten days why these cases should not be stayed pending the Federal Circuit’s disposition of Network Signature’s anticipated appeal in State Farm. The Court will conduct a hearing at 10:00 a.m on July 2, 2012. A failure to file a response will be deemed acquiescence in the Court’s proposed course of action.

For their information, the Court is sending a copy to other judges who are presiding over similar Network Signature cases.

In the interim, all proceedings are stayed.

cc:

Judge Guilford 8:12-cv-00495-AG (ANx) Network Signatures Inc v. Time Warner Cable Inc

8:12-cv-00497-AG (ANx) Network Signatures Inc v. Tyson Foods, Inc

Judge Carney 8:11-cv-01205-CJC (MLGx) Network Signatures Inc v. Staples Inc

8:11-cv-01964-CJC (RNBx) Network Signatures Inc v. Wellpoint Inc

Judge Pregerson 8:11-cv-01483-DDP (RNBx) Network Signatures Inc v. Novartis Corporation Judge Tucker 8:12-cv-00569-JST (RNBx) Network Signatures Inc v Chevron Corporation Judge Otero 2:11-cv-10663-SJO (RNBx) Network Signatures Inc v. Safeway Inc Judge Pfaelzer 8:12-cv-00140-MRP (MLGx) Network Signatures, Inc. v. Comcast Corporation

[00] : 0 Initials of Preparer ag

Case Details

Case Name: Network Signatures Inc v. Aetna Inc
Court Name: District Court, C.D. California
Date Published: Jun 14, 2012
Docket Number: 8:11-cv-01674
Court Abbreviation: C.D. Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.