History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nessmith v. Peeples
1916 Ga. LEXIS 526
Ga.
1916
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The verdict rendered in this case is supported by the evidence, and the grounds of the amended motion for a new trial disclose no error which requires a reversal of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

AU the Justices concur, except Gilbert, J., not presiding.

Case Details

Case Name: Nessmith v. Peeples
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 23, 1916
Citation: 1916 Ga. LEXIS 526
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.