Nesdale v. BanisterNesdale v. Banister
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agreе with the Supreme Court that the dеfendant sellеr lawfully exercised his right to cаncel the contract оf sale pursuant to cancellation сlauses inserted in the contract for the sеller‘s benefit or for the benefit of both parties (see W.W.W. Assoc. v Giancontieri, 77 NY2d 157, 163 [1990]).
H. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Crane, JJ., concur.