Julie Nesbitt brought suit against West-port Square Ltd., d/b/a The Prospect, for injuries she received while riding in an automobile driven by Susan Sperry. The petition alleged Sperry was 18 years of age at the time and had been served intoxicating liquor at The Prospect in violation of § 311.310, RSMo 1978. The petition alleged the accident was the proximate result of Sperry’s intoxication.
The trial court sustained a motion to dismiss for failure of the petition to state facts upon which relief could be granted. On this appeal Nesbitt contends the petition did state a cause of action under
Sampson v. W. F. Enterprises, Inc.,
In
Sampson
this court held that a petition which alleged that the plaintiff’s son had been served intoxicating liquor at two taverns in violation of § 311.310 stated a cause of action for the death of the son resulting from his errant driving because of the intoxication. The only difference between the facts in
Sampson
and those here is that Sampson involved injuries to the minor who had been illegally served intoxicants, while in this case Nesbitt rests her claim on the negligence of Sperry who, as a minor, had been served intoxicants. Sampson relied on the reasoning in
Moore v. Riley,
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
All concur.
