Nenzel v. Rochester Silver Corporation, 263 P. 777

Nenzel v. Rochester Silver Corporation

263 P. 777

| Nev. | 1928

Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING It is ordered that the petition for rehearing be denied, since the court is entirely satisfied with its former opinion, 50 Nev. 352,259 P. 632, as to the matters presented on original submission, and as to the new points urged they cannot be now considered. Pedroli v. Scott, 47 Nev. 313, 221 P. 241, 224 P. 807, 31 A.L.R. 841.

Concurrence Opinion

I concur.

Concurrence Opinion

I concur. *Page 440

Dissenting Opinion

I concurred only in the order made herein. Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing I entertain serious doubt as to the correctness of the point decided, that water rights are "realty," subject to unlawful detainer under Revised Laws, sec. 5588, and therefore I dissent from the order denying the petition for rehearing.