History
  • No items yet
midpage
Nelson v. State
21 Tex. Ct. App. 351
Tex. App.
1886
Check Treatment
White, Presiding Judge.

Prosecution was instituted against appellant by complaint in a justice’s court, for selling beer on Sunday. Being convicted, he appealed to the district court, where his appeal was dismissed for want of a final judgment in the justice’s court. On motion of the count7 attorney a judgment final was entered nunc pro tunc in the justice’s court, and appellant again appealed from the last judgment to the county court, which latter court had in the mean time, it seems, acquired jurisdiction of the case. In the county court a motion to dismiss the appeal was sustained upon the fourth ground, we take it, as set out in the motion, viz: “ Because no notice of this appeal was given at the time and during the term this cause was tried in the justice’s court.”

Appellant had, it seems, never appealed from a valid final judgment.’ When a valid final judgment was rendered in the justice’s court against him, no matter whether at the same term when the trial was had or not, he had a right to appeal from that” judgment. This he did on July 18, 1885, when the final judgment nunc pro tunc was rendered by the justice, by giving notice of appeal and- filing his appeal bond in the justice’s court on said day.

It whs error to dismiss the appeal, and the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Nelson v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: May 19, 1886
Citation: 21 Tex. Ct. App. 351
Docket Number: No. 3679
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.